Plant Power Challenge Day 17      

Fish Is Not the Solution

“In the final analysis, it is about food-based nutrition, not about nutrient based nutrition that really matters.”         
~ T. Colin Campbell, PhD.

Fish and other seafood have long been considered one of the healthiest animal food products because of the omega-3 fatty acids and because some varieties are lower in fat.  However, fish and seafood also contain cholesterol, saturated fat and are at high risk of contamination from pollutants including PCBs, dioxin, mercury, organochlorines, pesticides and DDT. Supplementing with fish oil may do more harm than good. Even with the highly regulated molecular distillation process, fish oil supplements have still been found to contain these detrimental compounds.

Mercury levels in the northern Pacific Ocean have risen about 30 percent over the past 20 years and are expected to rise by 50 percent more by 2050 as industrial mercury emissions increase, according to a 2009 study led by researchers at the U.S. Geological Survey and Harvard University.

Mercury-containing plants and tiny animals are eaten by smaller fish that are then gobbled up by larger fish, whose tissues accumulate the mercury. That’s why larger, longer-living predators such as sharks and swordfish tend to have more toxins than smaller fish such as sardines, sole, and trout. In comments submitted to federal health officials earlier this year, a group of scientists and policy analysts pointed out that a
6-ounce serving of salmon contains about 4 micrograms of mercury vs. 60 micrograms for the same portion of canned albacore tuna—and 170 micrograms for swordfish. When you eat seafood containing methylmercury, more than 95 percent is absorbed, passing into your bloodstream. It can move throughout your body, where it can penetrate cells in any tissue or organ.